Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Flood Levels

Interested in a plot of land? How might it be affected by global warming? Find your area of interest via the link and vary the flood levels from (1)metre to (14) metres. Even if you're not worried about global warming it is at least a bit of fun! Glad to see that despite being a mile inland I should soon own some prime beachfront real estate. Shame about the neighbours further down the road though.... http://flood.firetree.net/

Tuesday, December 19, 2006


The Future Build Exhibition at Earls Courts lasts from the 27th February 2007-the 1st March 2007. Innovative and cutting edge design on display in the world of property development, construction & design. Plenty of seminars to visit too. Take a look here. I went last year, didn't pay to enter any seminars just nosed around the exhibition itself though I think I will be forking out this year to listen in on some. Definately worth putting in your diary. If anything there is a danger of information overload!

https://www.blaxx.net/2007/fut/reg/


If you object to your company being mentioned, or your website being linked to in this post please contact us here.

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Well look at this. Somehow I don't see our Local Authority planners letting me demolish my 1894 built house to replace it with one of these. The apartments are known as Reversible Destiny Lofts. To make life interesting the floor of the dining room slopes erratically, the one in the kitchen is sunken and the study is something else, featuring a concave floor! Power switches are located in quite unexpected places making it interesting for you when you return home at 4 a.m. after a night in a club and triple vision induced by too much alcohol intake. A glass door to the veranda is so small you have to bend to crawl out. One constantly loses balance, trips and falls, great for granny with broken hips and dislocated knees galore! There's no airing cupboard space and residents will have to find a way to live there. "[The apartment] makes you alert and awakens instincts, so you'll live better, longer and even forever," says Arakawa.
Some hope after you have fallen over and banged your head!
This development was completed last October, the apartments are selling for $763,000 each—about twice as much as a normal apartment in that neighborhood.

The architects are Shusaku Arakawa and Madeline Gins, whose moto is Architecture Against Death. The development was unveiled a few months ago and forms a small apartment complex in the Tokyo suburb of Mitaka. Whether the apartments are anything but comfortable and calming is open to interpretation. "People, particularly old people, shouldn't relax and sit back to help them decline," Arakawa insists. "They should be in an environment that stimulates their senses and invigorates their lives".

With some of the crazy stuff I see this job leaves me emotionally drained sometimes so read more here!

More information here:
http://royalhomestoronto.typepad.com/rhtoronto/
http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/008304.php#comments
http://www.reversibledestiny.org/mitaka.php

Well done CPRE

Tim Harrold esq is a happy man. Mr. Harrod is chairman of the Campaign to Protect Rural England. Last week a High Court Judge, a Mr Justice Sullivan, stated that plastic tunnels put up over fruit fields must have planning permission. They are therefore currently illegal. Now you may know the things, these are the semi-circular clear plastic structures you see covering fields as you drive along the M2, M25 on your way to work. Let's be frank, some fields are covered in the things and they don't look terribly appealing. I'd rather not see them but their presence is a small price to pay for their benefits. Farming is a business and the purpose of business is to maximize output with as little input as possible in order to produce profit. That doesn't mean giving carte blanche to go giving people Mad Cow disease in order to boost profit but it does mean drawing a reasonable balance to a situation, pros and cons, you get the picture, something that people do everyday in one way or other. The fruit business is worth £200M p.a. and polytunnels as they are known ensure the protection of fruit from the elements. Consequently their use extends the growing season past the usual six or seven week spell. Up to now farmers avoided planning rules arguing rightly that tunnels were temporary structures. A test case was bought by the Hall Hunter Partnership which owns Tuesley Farm near Godalming last year. The farm owners had lost a planning inquiry last December (2005) when a planning inspector ruled that the erection of polytunnels was 'development'. Tuesley farm had 60 hectares of land covered by polytunnels. (Opps in prime greenbelt Surrey countryside). In this latest case they sought to overturn this. Tim Straker from the farm stated that the tunnels were an agricultural use of land and therefore a permitted development which would not require planning consent. Unfortunately the Judge upheld the planning inspector's decision and also stated that putting 45 caravans on the farm for hundreds of workers (hundreds?) was not permitted development. As of the 1st January 2007 all growers will have to comply with the new rules. This brings us back to Tim Harrold, Chairman of the CPRE who stated "We are delighted. It is a wonderful result because people have stood up and been counted defending some of the most important countryside we have." Really Mr Harrold. Why exactly is it "....some of the most important countryside we have" ? Because you live there in Surrey perhaps? Wouldn't everyone with the same thought process as Mr Harrold living in their chosen area of countryside from Lands End to John O' Groats say the same? More seriously the countryside needs protecting from the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England! These are the people who appear to be contributing to the ruin of the rural economy so we have more fallow fields. The fruit industry is worth £200M p.a. A good proportion of that income and services supplied to that industry provide tax to the Treasury and an income to a rural economy that has been in some serious distress for the last decade or more. So let us imagine then a large proportion of this industry being desimated because of the planning inspector's upheld decision. What is it going to be replaced with? Nothing? What about the immigrants who toil the fields? (They're welcome to, I wouldn't.) With a coninual flow there will be a bit less work for them now and a little more stress on the social security system. What will fill the void? Cheap imports of strawberries? Great, there goes more of our industry abroad. Around a third of agricultural land lays dormant at present. A few more fields will surely not hurt? That's great because housing companies will then seek Options to Buy on the most suitable fallow land with a long term view to development in which case if you are a farmer, your planning application is turned down and you want to sell the land CALL US on 01843 834938. We have companies seeking well placed strateigic land! The industry, as I have stated brings in £200M p.a. on only 0.01% of the UK's agricultural land so according to Chairman of British Summer Fruits Laurence Olins. Yes, o.o1% of the UK's agricultural land, not much is it? British Summer Fruits represents growers who supply 92% of UK soft and stone fruit. The National Farmer's Union has also expressed 'extreme disappointment' at the ruling. Lastly Monty Don has joined protesters against the 'rape of the countryside' (somewhat the term undermines such a traumatic act) by 'berry barons' mass producing out-of-season fruit. Well done Monty, your attempt to bring skag users to their senses and get off drugs and plant spuds instead will more than backfire with what will be interpreted as a country elitist stance against townies, except it isn't is it? What you're doing is stabbing your own in the back, those who make money from growing stuff.
So what have we seen by this latest ruling of the High Court's? Yes we are truly a backward country with small minded attitudes and a selfish elite. I ask you, 0.01% of the countryside effected by these tunnels, get over it fellahs, stick your pompous egos away and draw those that actually produce wealth some slack. You'll appreciate it when you're in your 80s, on a dialysis machine and burning telephone directories to keep warm.

I will have a severe case of smug satisfaction if planning authorities more or less give default permission for the continued erection of these polytunnels. There they will remain and the Courts and beneficiaries of the court's ruling such as the CPRE will have gained very little at all from the time spent on this. Perhaps a case of direct action and refusal to comply by all farmers is now required. Is this the beginning of country -v- country with the old opponent, townie relugated to 2nd division?

p/s Tory MP Bill Wiggin recently warned that eating strawberries out of season was ruining the British countryside. If you see the Rt Hon Bill Wiggin buying strawberries out of season (basically anytime other than the period covered by school holidays) will you please get a photograph if possible and post it to us? We'd love to publish it. Photos of Mr Wiggin can be found here: http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=bill%20wiggin%20mp&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

If you feel you have been misquoted, the facts here are wrong or you want to moan at us go ahead and we'll see what we can do to rectify the situation. Email us contact(at)landsolutions.co.uk (Replace (at) with @ as them pesky net bots pick up the properly written email and send us spam)

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Long Story Shortish.

England from the 1750s into the early 1800s saw the introduction of the enclosures. For each enclosure a bill had to go before Parliament to pass to statute. Enclosures were exactly what it states; arable land which was ‘enclosed’ by wealthy landowners. Whilst each enclosure required a bill before Parliament, in Surrey for instance there was a high incidence of nearly as much as 50% being turned down as a result of counter-petitions. That said, thousands of poor had toiled the land for generations. Prior to enclosure, no matter how poor people were most had a degree of economic independence. Most of them owned a few strips of land, which they grew food on. Even squatters had rights to use common land. Here they could graze animals, cut turf and collect wood for fuel. Commoners’ rights allowed the poor to survive and to feed their families.
Steadily more land was enclosed by landowners, forcing the people whose livlihood had depended on it away and into cities to work in the mills and pits owned by some of these landowners!
How does this affect you, us now?

1). We all live in densely packed villages towns and cities defined by settlement boundaries outside of which development is nearly impossible.
2). Approximately 10% of all land in the UK is urbanized.
3). Approximately 13% of land is classified Greenbelt by Local Plans. (Don’t make the mistake that all countryside is Greenbelt. It can also be classified Greenfield and Arable etc).
4). The rest is arable, downland, heathland, mountain, river, lake etc.
5). Approximately 30% of arable land in the UK lays fallow.
6). Who benefits from not being allowed to build a house in the countryside with half an acre, an acre or more to it? The big landowners? Not us urbanites or townies as we are called. We’re kept in our place, out of the countryside and into urban ghettos in some cases.
7). Who is led to believe building in the countryside is sacrosanct? Yes, us! The urbanites and townies! We are told it is bad to build in the countryside. Newspapers scream the southeast is being concreted over. What total rubbish. These headlines appeal to those of us who drive along the M25 and look 100 metres each side of it and think “Look at what’s happening to the countryside, there isn’t much left”.
Do yourselves a favour this Christmas. Take the car out for a drive, go off the motorways, the A roads and get out into the countryside and look at how much space there is. Enough for people to have a sizeable piece for themselves. Not everyone wants an acre of land; some would be happy with a tenth of an acre or a fifth of an acre but not squeezed into an urban metropolis. Travellers have been widely abused by the British Press for setting up sites without planning consent. Whilst it hasn’t always been an easy ride there are numerous small encampments of an acre or so which have no real impact at all on the countryside. How long before renegade youngsters, fed up with the stuffed shirt conservative planners and busy-body Parish Councillors go out into the countryside and build their houses without planning consent? With modular and prefabricated units the possibility of being moved off land owned by them or even rented isn’t so much a worry. Look at the M-House for instance. It’s classified a caravan. You wouldn’t want to tow it though. The authorities won’t stop everyone who wants a house building one….would they? Either Parliament comes up with a total reform of the Town & Country planning Act 1948 administered by planners in town halls employed on £30,000+ p.a. with a vested interest in the current status quo or I see big problems ahead. Nothing short of a total overhall will do. Prior to 1948 landowners could build houses on their land with little hinderance. The problem occurred with ribbon development, building along country lanes and not off and into the countryside which would cost more with the requirement to put in new roads.
Save the Greenbelt? You’ve all been conned and the big landowners continue to fool you. There is plenty out there for everyone and more than enough for wildlife and arable operations. Now anyone heard anything about plans concerning Residential Park Estates?

Happy Christmas.

Barker Review & the IoD

Business leaders admit productivity can be improved by getting to grips with the planning system. The Institute of Directors (IoD) has welcomed the publication of the Barker Review. Improvements to the planning system are a critical step to the UK’s future economic health.
IOD Director General Miles Templeman said:-
“Two principles need to dominate the reform of land use planning in the UK. Greater speed in the commercial planning system and a greater supply of land for commercial and residential developments.
“The Barker Review appears to get the balance right between the needs of a 21st century economy and the rights of those affected by new developments.”
Mr Templeman also said:
“Full implementation of the Barker Review could play a significant role in boosting UK productivity and competitiveness”.
The IoD gives backing to the following recommendations in the Barker Review:
• Radical overhaul of the planning system for major infrastructure projects, including transport, energy and waste.• Increasing the speed of the planning process.• Updating planning guidance to clarify the full economic benefits of development applications. • Reducing unnecessary bureaucracy and the cost of the planning process.• Sharp reductions in the number of ministerial call-ins.• Ensuring a sufficient supply of land for development which is required outside urban areas.
The government has just published a number of initiatives offering to deliver a faster, more efficient planning system. The Government claims will provide an estimated savings of £124m to business.
Initiatives include a single, national planning application form for use across all local authorities. The Government claim this will save £59m.
£38m will be saved ‘through enabling and encouraging businesses to submit planning applications electronically’.
On top of that, £27m will be saved from a ‘more consistent criteria for planning applications’.
The proposals form part of a government action plan identifying more than 500 ways to reduce red tape that was unveiled by the Prime Minister this week.
It is estimated savings to business of more than £2bn in administrative costs will be made. The proposals across 19 departments and agencies have been identified as a result of comprehensive consultation. The aim is to cut 25% of administrative burdens by 2010.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Ikea House


I saw this mentioned in the Daily Mail whilst in hospital. A continuation of a story that has been hanging around a while now. Ikea's BoKlok (careful how you say that) is a range of cheap timber-framed houses and flats. The BoKlok will be offered to customers at Ikea stores. The houses will cost between £100,000 and £150,000. If you're worried that you'll be struggling with a set of flatpack instructions don't! The houses will not be available to customers to build themselves. I can't bear to think what might happen otherwise...Assemble wall D1 to meet adjaisent with D4 and floor C6 whilst incorporating heating units P2,4 and 8 and wiring assemblige x4-10 inclusive. BoKloks, means smart living in Swedish. Keep it smart and leave it to the professionals to do! For more information visit http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=419967&in_page_id=1770&ito=1490 and http://www.boklok.com/

Do you think you have land suitable for this type of development or any other? Call us on 01843 834938 or email us via our website at http://www.landsolutions.co.uk

If you object to your company being mentioned, or your website being linked to in this post please contact us here.